peter-2006.bib
@comment{{This file has been generated by bib2bib 1.99}}
@comment{{Command line: bib2bib -c 'year=2006 and not annote:"skip_html" and not annote:"unpublished"' -ob peter-2006.bib -oc peter-2006.cite peter.bib}}
@inproceedings{baader_et_al:DSP:2006:562,
author = {Franz Baader and Peter Baumgartner and Robert Nieuwenhuis and Andrei Voronkov},
title = {05431 Abstracts Collection -- Deduction and Applications},
booktitle = {Deduction and Applications},
year = {2006},
editor = {Franz Baader and Peter Baumgartner and Robert Nieuwenhuis and Andrei Voronkov},
number = {05431},
series = {Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings},
issn = {1862-4405},
publisher = {Internationales Begegnungs- und Forschungszentrum (IBFI), Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany},
optaddress = {Dagstuhl, Germany},
url = {http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2006/562},
note = {$<$http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2006/562$>$
[date of citation: 2006-01-01]},
optannote = {Keywords: Formal logic, deduction, artificial intelligence}
}
@inproceedings{Baumgartner:Schmidt:BUMGEnhanced:IJCAR:2006,
author = {Peter Baumgartner and Renate Schmidt},
title = {Blocking and Other Enhancements for Bottom-Up Model Generation Methods},
booktitle = {Automated Reasoning -- Third International Joint Conference on Automated Reasoning (IJCAR)},
year = {2006},
url = {BUMG-enhanced.pdf},
publisher = {Springer},
editor = {U. Furbach and N. Shankar},
era = {A},
volume = {4130},
pages = {125-139},
series = {LNAI},
abstract = {In this paper we introduce several new improvements to the bottom-up
model generation (BUMG) paradigm.
Our techniques are based on non-trivial transformations of first-order
problems into a certain implicational form, namely range-restricted
clauses.
These refine existing transformations to range-restricted
form by extending the domain of interpretation with new Skolem terms
in a more careful and deliberate way.
Our transformations also extend BUMG with a blocking technique for
detecting recurrence in models.
Blocking
is based on a conceptually rather simple encoding together
with standard equality theorem proving and redundancy elimination
techniques.
This provides a general-purpose method for finding small models.
The presented techniques are implemented and have been successfully
tested with existing theorem provers on the satisfiable problems from
the TPTP library.}
}
@inproceedings{Baumgartner:etal:MEFiniteModels:Disproving:2006,
author = {Peter Baumgartner and Alexander Fuchs and and Hans de~Nivelle and Cesare Tinelli},
title = {Computing Finite Models by Reduction to Function-Free Clause Logic},
crossref = {Ahrendt:etal:Disproving:IJCAR-WS:2006},
month = {July},
abstract = {
Recent years have
seen
considerable interest in procedures for
computing
finite
models of first-order logic specifications. One
of the major paradigms, MACE-style model building, is based on
reducing model search to
a sequence of
propositional
satisfiability problems and applying (efficient) SAT solvers
to them.
A
problem with this method is that it does not scale well, as the
propositional formulas to be considered may become very large.
\par
We propose instead to reduce model search to
a sequence of
satisfiability problems
made
of function-free first-order clause sets, and
to apply (efficient) theorem provers capable of deciding
such problems.
The
main
appeal of this method is that
first-order clause
sets grow more slowly than their propositional counterparts, thus
allowing for more space efficient reasoning.
\par
In the paper we describe the method in detail and show how it is
integrated into one such
prover,
Darwin, our implementation of the
Model Evolution calculus. The results are general, however,
as our approach can used in principle with any system that decides
the satisfiability of function-free first-order clause sets.
\par
To demonstrate
its
practical feasibility, we tested our approach
on all satisfiable problems from the TPTP library. Our methods can
solve a significant subset of these problems,
which overlaps but is not included in the subset of problems
solvable by state-of-the-art finite model builders such as
Paradox and Mace4.},
url = {ME-finite-models.pdf}
}
@inproceedings{Baumgartner:etal:ModelEvolutionLearning:LPAR:2006,
author = {Peter Baumgartner and Alexander Fuchs and Cesare Tinelli},
title = {Lemma Learning in the Model Evolution Calculus},
url = {ME-lemma-learning.pdf},
era = {A},
abstract = {The Model Evolution (ME) Calculus is a proper lifting
to first-order logic of the DPLL procedure,
a backtracking
search procedure for propositional satisfiability.
Like DPLL, the ME calculus is based on the idea of
incrementally building a model of the input formula
by alternating constraint propagation steps with
non-deterministic decision steps.
One of the major conceptual improvements over basic DPLL
is lemma learning,
a mechanism for generating new formulae
that prevent later in the search
combinations of decision steps guaranteed to lead to failure.
We introduce three lemma generation methods for
ME proof procedures,
with various degrees of power, effectiveness in reducing search,
and computational overhead.
Even if formally correct,
each of these methods presents complications
that do not exist at the propositional level but need to be addressed
for learning to be effective in practice for ME.
We discuss some of these issues and
present
initial experimental results on the performance
of an implementation within Darwin of the three learning procedures.},
optcrossref = {},
optkey = {},
booktitle = {Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence and Reasoning (LPAR)},
pages = {572-586},
year = {2006},
editor = {Miki Hermann and Andrei Voronkov},
volume = {4246},
optnumber = {},
series = {LNAI},
optaddress = {},
optmonth = {},
optorganization = {},
publisher = {Springer},
optannote = {}
}
@inproceedings{Baumgartner:Suchanek:AutomatedReasoningFOOntologies:PPSWR:2006,
author = {Peter Baumgartner and Fabian M. Suchanek},
title = {Automated Reasoning Support for First-Order Ontologies},
optkey = {},
optmonth = {},
year = {2006},
booktitle = {Principles and Practice of Semantic Web Reasoning
4th International Workshop (PPSWR 2006), Revised Selected Papers},
url = {PPSWR2006_long.pdf},
publisher = {Springer},
abstract = {Formal ontologies play an increasingly important role in demanding
knowledge representation applications like the Semantic Web.
Regarding automated reasoning support, the mainstream of research
focusses on ontology languages that are also Description Logics,
such as OWL-DL. However, many existing ontologies go beyond
Description Logics and use full first-order logic. We propose a
novel transformation technique that allows to apply existing model
computation systems in such situations. We describe the
transformation and some variants, its properties and intended
applications to ontological reasoning.},
editor = {J.J. Alferes and J. Bailey and W. May and U. Schwertel},
volume = {4187},
series = {LNAI}
}
@article{Baumgartner:etal:Darwin:IJAIT:2006,
author = {Peter Baumgartner and Alexander Fuchs and Cesare
Tinelli},
title = {Implementing the Model Evolution Calculus},
journal = {International Journal of Artificial Intelligence
Tools},
era = {C},
year = {2006},
editor = {Stephan Schulz and Geoff Sutcliffe and Tanel Tammet},
volume = 15,
number = 1,
pages = {21--52},
url = {implementing-ME-published.pdf}
}
@proceedings{Ahrendt:etal:Disproving:IJCAR-WS:2006,
title = {Third Workshop on Disproving - Non-Theorems, Non-Validity, Non-Provability (DISPROVING'06)},
booktitle = {Third Workshop on Disproving - Non-Theorems, Non-Validity, Non-Provability (DISPROVING'06)},
year = {2006},
optkey = {},
editor = {Wolfgang Ahrendt and Peter Baumgartner and Hans de Nivelle},
optvolume = {},
optnumber = {},
optseries = {},
address = {Seattle},
optmonth = {},
optorganization = {},
optpublisher = {},
note = {Workshop at IJCAR'06},
optannote = {}
}